Exactly right. This is the fundamental problem with believing in any kind of creator - the creator had to be created first.If the theory of Intelligent Design were true that would mean that God had to have been created, correct?
Correct. An intelligent creator. It has an in-built paradox.
An intelligent creator would require an intelligent creator, ad infinitum. This contrasts with any 'natural process' theory, which is compatible with time having a beginning.
That is a separate issue from the matter of evidence and supportability.
No, actually the theory states that anything that has been created must have a creator. It's the idea that physical things have been created, based on all observable laws of science and nature. It doesn't negate the idea that a spiritual power could exist outside of nature who is responsible for that first act of physical creation. It's really not that drastically different a principle than what scientists keep inventing to try to explain away things they observe. Things like the multiverse theory that says there are many universes and one just spawns other universes, or the life came from space theory. They just push creation out further, even though it contradicts observation.
The fact that the multiverse has always been is too much for your peanut brain and my peanut brian to understand It is the Beginning and the End my friend. It was forever and forever will be! It's like trying to explain to a person who is blind from birth what the color red looks like.
The fact that God has always been is too much for your peanut brain and my peanut brian to understand He is the Beginning and the End my friend. He was forever and forever will be! It's like trying to explain to a person who is blind from birth what the color red looks like.
No, because the ';supernatural'; has different rules than the mortal.
Even if the ';supernatural'; existed, mortal wouldn't be able to understand it. Mortal can only understand mortal.
Your logic shows their foolishness.
Also, it is not a 'theory', not in scientific terms.
It's a hypothesis or guess based on wishful thinking.
I do not believe in ID, however they do not try to explain the intelligence behind the design. If they do, they are creationists.
True.
Any version of creationism requires the creation of a god prior to creation.
If natural selection was true, there would be no such thing as fainting goats.
Ever heard of Moebius belt?
How can threre be matter with only energy for the big bang to happen?
There is someone called the tooth fairy, and she.....
No, no, no! Everything has to have a designer ... except... er... well.... er.... god just popped into being.... or was always there... the rules don't apply to god...
Oh
I've been saying this for years, they don't get it
Its always answered: ';BUT THE FIRST CAUSE AND ETERNAL AND STUFF';
not at all
No comments:
Post a Comment